The submission represents a standard IT staffing and recruitment agency but suffers critically from poor data quality and exaggerated claims. While the claimed team size (125) suggests a functional business, the financial metrics are incoherent (mixing 'marketcap' with revenue fields and lacking currency units), and the traction claims ('most people have used my product') are objectively false for a B2B service. The lack of verifiable technical innovation or specific audience targeting further reduces the score. The project is penalized heavily for low-credibility signals and a lack of supporting evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline