The project represents a functional IoT integration platform ('Instathings') with a live website and clear value proposition for developers. However, the PoU submission itself is critically flawed. The claims that the audience is 'everyone' and that 'most people have used my product' are factually incorrect and severely damage credibility. The technical description ('Technologies Used: Internet') is unacceptably vague. While the underlying software solves a legitimate problem (IoT fragmentation), the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of the claimed traction or revenue ($500k market cap is ambiguous). The score reflects a legitimate early-stage product penalized heavily for delusional traction claims and a low-effort submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline