The submission for Insane Marketers presents significant red flags regarding data quality and credibility. While the launch date (2016) and team size range suggest an established agency, the claim 'most people have used my product' regarding traction is demonstrably false and hyperbolic. The target audience of 'everyone' indicates a lack of strategic focus. The submission fails to provide verifiable revenue or active user data ('marketcap: null'), and the lack of specific technical innovation details results in a minimal score. The project is evaluated as a standard service agency with a low-quality submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline