Proof of Usefulness Report

InPilot

Analysis completed on 1/23/2026

-4
Proof of Usefulness Score
Lab Mode

The submission for 'InPilot' presents significant red flags, most notably the verifiable falsehood that 'most people have used my product' for a niche B2B Field Force Automation tool with no observable web presence. The inputs are contradictory (Business Type vs. Audience Reach) and nonsensical (Revenue field contains 'all time marketcap: null'). Due to the lack of evidence, likely non-existent product, and deceptive claims, a penalty has been applied to the Traction metric, resulting in a negative Proof of Usefulness score consistent with the calibration for 'Red Flags'.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility0.25)
Audience Reach Impact0.20)
Technical Innovation0.15)
Evidence Of Traction0.25)
Market Timing Relevance0.10)
Functional Completeness0.05)
Subtotal-3.25
Usefulness Multiplierx1.15
Final Score-4

Project Details

Project URL
Description
InPilotis in the Field Force Automation Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Early stage requiring focused development
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline