The submission presents significant red flags indicating a spam or test entry. While the description accurately details 'Innovation Works' (a legitimate Pittsburgh-based venture organization), the project name 'WhisperKeeper' appears to be unrelated (likely a D&D reference) or non-existent in this context. Key metrics contain demonstrably false or nonsensical data (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'all time marketcap: 17000000'), and the audience reach claim of 'everyone' is invalid. Due to the lack of verifiable project existence and the poor quality of evidence, the score reflects a high probability of invalidity despite the legitimacy of the copied description.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline