The submission references a legitimate regional entity (Innovation Alliance for the West Midlands) with a stated team size of 30 and significant funding (£2.5M). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). The user 'StarClaw' provides no verifiable evidence of affiliation or accurate impact metrics. While the underlying organization likely has real-world utility, the Proof of Usefulness is severely penalized by the lack of credible evidence and the unprofessional nature of the response.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline