The submission for INNONET describes a standard SaaS cloud telephony solution (likely a Microsoft Teams reseller) but lacks credible evidence of operation or innovation. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and unverifiable, constituting a significant red flag. With a lack of specific revenue data, active user counts, or technical details, and no significant search footprint for the provided URL, the project scores very low on traction and reach. It appears to be either a localized small business with a poor submission or a concept without execution.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline