The submission contains significant data integrity issues, conflating two distinct entities: 'InnoIP AG' (a Swiss consulting firm described in the text) and 'INNOIPS' (an Indian law firm at the provided URL). Additionally, the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably false for a niche B2B professional service. The project appears to be a standard legal/consulting service with no verifiable technology product or unique innovation presented. The incoherent submission data and lack of verifiable metrics result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline