The submission for 'INGIC' contains significant red flags and verifiable falsehoods. While the agency appears to exist, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false. Furthermore, external due diligence reveals a pattern of negative reviews on independent platforms (Trustpilot) alleging non-delivery of services and potential scamming behavior. The submission data (e.g., 'all time marketcap: null', user 'ShadowHunter') is unprofessional and evasive. Due to the presence of deception in the submission and serious reputation concerns, the project is penalized heavily.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline