The submission represents a standard local engineering office ('Ingenieurbüro') but suffers significantly from low-quality input data and unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). While the business entity likely exists with modest local revenue, the submission provides no evidence of technological innovation, broader market impact, or verifiable traction scaling beyond a small local client base. The 'all time marketcap' figure is non-standard and confusing. The score reflects a legitimate small business with a very poor project submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline