The submission describes a niche B2B facilities/engineering service ('IGC Solutions') rather than a scalable technology product. While the underlying business likely exists (established 2014, team of 6), the submission contains significant red flags and credibility issues. Specifically, the claim that 'everyone' is the audience and 'most people have used my product' is factually impossible for a specialized B2B firm. The revenue/market cap figure is ambiguous. The project scores poorly due to lack of verifiable digital traction, hyperbolic claims, and low submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline