The project represents a long-standing, reputable arts organization in Scotland with clear cultural value. However, the submission fails as a 'technology project' evaluation due to zero technical innovation and poor submission quality. The form data contradicts the professional description (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and citing 'marketcap' for a non-profit), indicating a likely low-effort or bot-generated entry for a legitimate physical entity. The score reflects high local utility but negligible digital scalability and low submission credibility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline