The project appears to be a local IT consultancy (MSP) based in Honolulu, established in 2014. While the business likely exists, the submission is plagued by hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'audience: everyone', 'most people have used my product'). The reported 'marketcap' of $2.5M for a 30-person team over 9 years is inconsistent with industry standards, suggesting data inaccuracy. The project relies on standard Microsoft technologies with no evidence of proprietary innovation. The low score reflects the poor quality of the submission and the lack of verifiable traction typically required for a high PoU rating.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline