The submission appears to be for a generic IT consultancy service but contains critical discrepancies and unverifiable claims. The domain 'idensys-tech.com' does not appear in standard search results, suggesting it is inactive or non-existent. The traction claim 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and hyperbolic for a B2B consultancy. The submission lists the name 'SwiftHunter' which conflicts with the project description. Due to the lack of a functional web presence, conflicting information, and unrealistic traction claims, the project scores negligible points on the PoU scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline