The project 'ICONOMI' is a legitimate, established UK-based digital asset management platform with significant verified traction (~100k users, FCA registered). However, the submission provided is of extremely low quality, containing vague claims ('everyone', 'most people') and missing key metrics. While external verification confirms the project's 'Comparable Scale' status (justifying a base score alignment with established brands), the 'Response Quality' and 'Quality Factors' are heavily penalized due to the lack of evidence in the input. The final score reflects a real, useful product dragged down by a poor Proof of Usefulness submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline