The project presents itself as an academic publishing and conference organization (IARCON International LLP) but lacks verifiable evidence of legitimate traction or scholarly impact. The submission contains significant red flags, including the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' and an invalid email format. While the stated goal of research dissemination is useful in theory, the generic description, lack of specific technology, and unsubstantiated claims suggest a low-maturity or potentially low-quality operation. The 'everyone' audience target is unrealistic for an academic niche.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline