Proof of Usefulness Report

Human

Analysis completed on 1/23/2026

+81
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business

The submission for 'Human.health' presents a legitimate domain associated with a personalized healthcare startup. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, characterized by hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'audience reach: everyone', 'most people have used my product'). The fields contain placeholder-like data (e.g., 'all time marketcap: null') and lack any verifiable evidence of the claimed traction. While the underlying project likely has utility in the chronic disease tracking space, the PoU methodology heavily penalizes the lack of evidence and the presence of red flags in the submission itself. The score reflects a 'Minimal Traction / Red Flag' status due to the disconnect between the submission's claims and reality.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+37.5
Audience Reach Impact+10
Technical Innovation+15
Evidence Of Traction+12.5
Market Timing Relevance+15
Functional Completeness+0
Subtotal+90
Usefulness Multiplierx0.9
Final Score+81

Project Details

Project URL
Description
Human.health

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline