The project 'Hroes' appears to be a legitimate early-stage HR compliance platform backed by a verifiable employment lawyer (Elissa Thursfield), which provides a baseline of real-world utility. However, the submission itself is of very low quality, containing blatant exaggerations (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and confused financial metrics ('marketcap' instead of revenue). While the problem-solution fit is strong, the lack of verifiable traction evidence and the unprofessional nature of the submission (user handle 'SwiftFang', vague audience definitions) heavily penalize the score. The score reflects a potentially promising small business hampered by a red-flag submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline