The project represents a standard local optometry practice rather than a scalable technology venture. While the business appears to be established with a team of 30, the submission suffers significantly from hyperbolic and factually incorrect claims (e.g., claiming 'most people' have used the product and listing 'marketcap' instead of revenue). There is no evidence of technical innovation or custom technology, limiting its scope to a traditional service model rather than a tech project.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline