The submission represents HESTA, a major Australian industry superannuation fund with over $70B AUD in assets and 1 million+ members. While the entity's real-world utility and reach are undeniable and massive, the submission itself is of extremely low quality. Key data points are incorrect (e.g., stating a $2.5M market cap for a multi-billion dollar fund) or lazy (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The 'GoldenWing' name is unexplained and appears to be a user error. The final score is buoyed significantly by the verifiable institutional scale of the domain provided, but heavily penalized for poor evidence and response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline