The submission references a legitimate early-stage company (Hemisens Technologies, ~$2.3M Seed funding) but is heavily penalized for critical inaccuracies and poor data quality. The project name 'StarClaw' appears unrelated to the company's actual cardiac imaging product ('Cardians'). Claims that the audience is 'everyone' and 'most people have used my product' are factually impossible for a specialized B2B medical device, suggesting either a test submission or significant user error. While the underlying technology (non-invasive cardiac imaging) has high potential utility, the submission fails to demonstrate it.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline