The submission describes 'Helio', a reputable user research platform by ZURB, but the entry contains significant inaccuracies and signs of low-quality automated filling. The claimant lists the audience as 'everyone' and 'most people have used my product', which are demonstrably false hyperbolic claims. Furthermore, the revenue field cites an 'all time marketcap' of 17M, confusing a SaaS business with crypto or public market terminology (potentially confusing it with Helio Protocol). While the actual product (helio.com) has utility and market presence, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence, lists irrelevant technologies ('Wireless'), and lacks professional quality, resulting in a heavily penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline