The submission represents 'Healthe by Lighting Science', a legitimate and established company in the circadian lighting space with verifiable history (formerly Lighting Science Group). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), missing financial data, and a placeholder name ('GoldenForge'). While external verification confirms the company's real-world utility and technical innovation (NASA collaboration, patents), the 'Proof of Usefulness' is severely hampered by the lack of specific evidence provided in the entry. The score reflects a balance between the verified existence of a mature company (comparable to the HackerNoon baseline) and the significant penalties for vague and exaggerated submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline