The project appears to be a standard local mental health private practice rather than a scalable technology venture. The submission contains significant red flags, including the hyperbolic and verifiable false claim that 'most people have used my product' and confusion between market cap and revenue. While the core service (therapy) has high real-world utility, the lack of technical innovation, limited audience reach, and low-quality submission data result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline