The project is a traditional recruitment consultancy rather than a technology product, resulting in a low innovation score. While the business appears established (founded 2013), the submission suffers from significant hyperbole (claiming 'everyone' as the audience and that 'most people' have used it) and ambiguous financial metrics ('all time marketcap'). The lack of verifiable technical leverage or scalable software components places it in the lowest tier of the PoU framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline