The submission describes 'GV' (Google Ventures), a high-profile entity, but the entry itself contains significant red flags indicating low quality or potential impersonation. Key contradictions include the launch date (1998) versus the description (2009), and the traction claim ('most people have used my product') which is factually inaccurate for a VC firm. The submission fails to provide specific, verifiable metrics or evidence of the submitter's legitimate connection to the project, resulting in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness within the context of this evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline