The submission lacks verifiable data and contains contradictory claims. While described as a 'stealth mode R&D startup', the claim that 'most people have used my product' is unsubstantiated and highly improbable without public visibility. The technical description ('Internet') is too generic to assess. The revenue field cites 'marketcap', which is not a valid revenue metric for this context. Due to the lack of concrete evidence, specific utility, or verifiable traction, the score reflects a project with no assessable proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline