The project represents a legitimate boutique consultancy and investment portfolio ('Growth Strategy') with verifiable ties to UK startups like CrowdProperty. However, the submission quality is critically low, featuring hallucinations ('most people have used my product'), vague audience definitions ('everyone'), and confusion between revenue and market cap. While the underlying business appears established with a team of 30, the project is a service business, not a technology platform, and lacks the scalable tech innovation required for a high score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline