The submission describes a standard SEO agency ('Growing Search') but suffers significantly from low-credibility claims in the application data. The statement that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a niche B2B agency, and the audience reach of 'everyone' is unrealistic. While the service itself (SEO) has utility, the lack of verifiable metrics, the absence of technical differentiation, and the poor quality of the response (e.g., 'all time marketcap: 500000') result in a very low score. This falls into the 'Minimal traction or red flags' category.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline