Grow Progress is a verifiable and substantial entity in the political technology space, with a team of ~63 employees and significant traction among major Democratic pollsters and advocacy groups (verified via PitchBook and external search). However, the project submission itself is of very poor quality, containing hyperbolic and lazy claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone'). This results in a score that recognizes the company's real-world scale (significantly larger than the reference calibration of HackerNoon) but imposes heavy penalties for the lack of evidence and professional detail in the input data. The project has high utility and market timing, but the submission fails to adequately document it.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline