The submission describes a standard professional coaching service but suffers critically from hyperbolic and unverifiable claims. Asserting that 'most people have used my product' and defining the audience as 'everyone' indicates a lack of market understanding or a non-serious submission. Furthermore, citing 'marketcap' for a consultancy business is irregular. While a legitimate solo practice may exist behind the description, the provided data lacks the evidence, specificity, and realism required for a higher PoU score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline