The submission contains verifiable falsehoods (claiming 'most people have used my product' without evidence) and extremely vague technical details ('Internet' listed as the only technology). The discrepancy between the claimed team size (30) and the lack of meaningful project description or traction signals suggests a high likelihood of a dormant, exaggerated, or low-validity project. The revenue metric appears to be a token market cap rather than operational revenue, further obscuring real-world utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline