The submission references 'Glynn Capital', a legitimate and high-profile venture capital firm with significant historical traction (investments in Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.). However, the submission data itself is of extremely poor quality, containing factually incorrect claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'everyone' audience, '75000000' market cap for a multi-billion AUM firm). The project name 'StarGale' does not appear to be a verifiable public initiative of the firm. The score acknowledges the firm's real-world existence and utility but is heavily penalized for the inaccurate, low-effort, and unverifiable details provided in the form.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline