The submission references GlobalGiving, a major, verified non-profit platform with significant real-world utility and reach. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring a suspicious submitter name ('LunarStorm'), unprofessional traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and inaccurate financial terminology ('marketcap'). While the underlying platform is established (scoring high on utility and reach verification), the specific submission lacks credibility, resulting in maximum Quality Factor penalties.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline