The submission contains critical red flags, specifically the hyperbolic and unverifiable traction claim that 'most people have used my product,' which is statistically impossible for a specialized real estate agency. The project appears to be a standard service business with no discernible technical innovation or software component. Additionally, the confusion between market capitalization and revenue, combined with the lack of specific, verifiable details, points to a low-quality or potentially automated submission. Consequently, the score reflects a lack of proof regarding utility and traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline