The submission suffers from critical credibility issues, specifically the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' and the confusion between revenue and market cap. While the domain implies a standard study abroad consultancy, the lack of verifiable technical innovation, specific audience data, or realistic traction metrics results in a near-zero score. The response quality is extremely low, providing no actionable evidence of utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline