The project is a service-based PR consultancy rather than a technology product, resulting in a zero score for technical innovation. While the firm appears to be a legitimate boutique agency (founded 2016), the submission contains demonstrably false and hyperbolic claims regarding traction (claiming 'most people' have used the product) and audience reach ('everyone'). The financial metric provided ('marketcap') is misused for a private service business, indicating low submission quality. The score reflects a small-scale service business with poor validation data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline