The submission appears to be factually incoherent, conflating two distinct entities: 'Ginko LLC' (the owner of ginko.mobi, a small mobile app developer in Ann Arbor) and 'Ginko International' (a major Taiwanese contact lens manufacturer with ~950 employees established in 2007). The description and URL point to the mobile app, while the team size, launch date, and business type refer to the contact lens company. This discrepancy, along with the hyperbolic and unverifiable claim that 'most people have used my product', severely undermines the credibility of the submission. The project is evaluated based on the actual mobile app (ginko.mobi), which appears to be a niche contact exchange tool with limited verifiable traction, rather than the large industrial entity whose stats were provided.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline