The submission represents a service-based PR consultancy rather than a technology product. It suffers from critical data quality issues, including hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' with null revenue and user stats). There is no evidence of technical innovation, and the 'technologies used' section lists generic concepts rather than a stack. The project falls into the lowest tier due to a lack of verifiable traction and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline