The submission for 'Ghaas' lacks verifiable evidence and relies on hyperbolic, substantiated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). Despite claiming to work with Fortune 100 companies, there is no public digital footprint, specific case studies, or verifiable metrics to support this. The response quality is low, containing null values and generic statements, suggesting either a lack of seriousness or a non-existent project.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline