The project 'getbird.bio' appears to be a legitimate social commerce and creator economy platform with verified existence via design case studies (Pepperplane) and investment records (Simple Capital Partners, exit noted Dec 2024). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the project has achieved some level of real-world traction (investment/exit), the submission fails to provide credible evidence, and the claimed 'marketcap' of 2.5M is ambiguous (likely valuation or exit value, not revenue). The score reflects a verifiable but small-scale project (~Seed/Series A level) heavily penalized for poor response quality and inaccurate claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline