Proof of Usefulness Report

Genius Returns

Analysis completed on 1/22/2026

-5
Proof of Usefulness Score
Lab Mode

The submission for 'Genius Returns' contains significant red flags, including verifiable falsehoods regarding traction ('most people have used my product') despite having zero search footprint or indexed website presence. The technical section lists 'leadership' as a technology, indicating a lack of seriousness or competence. No evidence of a functional product exists.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+1.25
Audience Reach Impact+0.0
Technical Innovation+0.0
Evidence Of Traction-6.25
Market Timing Relevance+0.5
Functional Completeness+0.0
Subtotal-4.5
Usefulness Multiplierx1.0
Final Score-5

Project Details

Description
Genius Returnsis in the E-Commerce Enablers Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Early stage requiring focused development
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline