The submission for 'Genie' contains significant contradictions and hyperbolic claims that severely impact its score. While the URL (getgenie.io) points to a legitimate WordPress AI content plugin with verifiable traction (~10k+ installs), the project description provided ('operational back-end... Shopify meets Notion') appears to be copied from a different entity or is a hallucination, as it does not match the actual product. Furthermore, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect and unprofessional. The 'construction' tag is likely a reference to page builders (Elementor) but is ambiguous. The score reflects the existence of the underlying tool but penalizes the low-quality, inaccurate submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline