The submission describes General Mills, a massive Fortune 500 food conglomerate. While the entity has undeniable real-world utility, global reach, and immense financial traction ($37B+ Market Cap), the submission itself is of low quality (vague claims, confusing 'StarGale' project name, incorrect revenue field usage). As a technology project evaluation, it scores poorly on innovation, but the sheer scale of the underlying business forces a high baseline score. The score is penalized for lack of specific technical novelty and submission effort.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline