The project submission suffers from critical credibility issues, primarily due to hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') that contradict the lack of verifiable online presence. The financial metrics are confused (listing market cap in a revenue field), and the technical description is non-existent. While the educational mission is theoretically useful, the lack of evidence, poor response quality, and potential red flags regarding traction result in a score near the bottom of the scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline