The submission for Gemba AI contains critical red flags, including demonstrably false claims of traction ('most people have used my product') and a lack of specific target audience definition ('everyone'). Search verification yields no credible footprint for the project or the provided URL. While the concept of an AI copilot for construction is relevant, the complete absence of evidence, combined with low-quality response data, results in a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline