The submission describes a standard PR consultancy rather than a technology project, with no detectable digital footprint (the domain 'katgazing.com' is not indexed). The input contains critical red flags, including objectively false claims about reach ('most people have used my product') and 'everyone' as the audience. Additionally, terminology is misused (e.g., 'marketcap' for a service business). Lacking verifiable evidence of operation or innovation, the project scores very low.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline