The submission for GAIA contains highly hyperbolic and unverifiable claims, such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone', which severely damages credibility. The description is extremely vague ('Legal Tech'), and the technology listed ('professional-services') suggests a service business rather than a technology product. With no verifiable digital footprint matching the claimed scale and a 'null' revenue entry, the project lacks evidence of utility, traction, or innovation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline