FundsEarth appears to be a legitimate boutique consultancy with verifiable links to high-level organizations like the UNCCD (co-authored reports found). However, the project submission is fraught with severe quality issues, including mismatched names ('StarHunter'), demonstrably false claims ('most people have used my product'), and ambiguous financial metrics ('all time marketcap' likely referring to project value or revenue). While the real-world utility of climate finance consulting is high, the project functions as a service business rather than a scalable technology product, and the poor submission quality heavily penalizes the final score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline