While Funding.com.au appears to be a legitimate and established Australian fintech entity (launching in 2015 with a team of 22), the submission itself is of critically low quality. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' are objectively false for a niche mortgage lender, severely undermining credibility. The project possesses inherent real-world utility, but the lack of verifiable metrics and the nonsensical traction claims in this specific application result in a significantly penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline